Compassionate Use vs Right-to-Try: Which Pathway Could Work for You?

Compassionate Use vs Right-to-Try: Which Pathway Could Work for You?

When standard treatments are exhausted and a clinical trial isn’t an option, two important pathways may still provide access to investigational therapies: Expanded Access (commonly called compassionate use) and Right-to-Try.

What Is Compassionate Use (Expanded Access)?

Expanded Access is a pathway established by the FDA that allows a patient with a serious or immediately life-threatening condition to access an investigational drug, biologic, or device outside of a clinical trial. The FDA approves over 99% of Expanded Access requests, often within a few days.

Key requirements:

  • No comparable or satisfactory approved therapy exists
  • The patient cannot participate in a clinical trial
  • Potential benefits justify the potential risks

What Is Right-to-Try?

The federal Right-to-Try Act (2018) allows eligible patients to access certain investigational drugs that have completed Phase 1 safety testing without going through the FDA’s Expanded Access process. The FDA’s role is limited to receiving annual reports from manufacturers.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Aspect Expanded Access (Compassionate Use) Right-to-Try
FDA Involvement Active review and approval (99% approval rate) Minimal — only receives annual reports
Drug Stage Required Any stage (as long as sponsor agrees) Must have completed Phase 1
Oversight & Safeguards Full FDA + IRB review Fewer federal safeguards
Physician Role Doctor files detailed request Doctor requests directly from manufacturer
Data Reporting Safety data reported to FDA Limited mandatory reporting
Usage in Practice Used thousands of times per year Used very rarely


Practical Considerations for Families

  • Cost: Manufacturers often provide the drug at no cost, but patients may still pay for monitoring, travel, and hospital fees.
  • Time: Expanded Access can move quickly (days to weeks) once the manufacturer agrees.
  • Manufacturer Willingness: This is often the biggest hurdle for both pathways — the company must be willing and able to supply the product.
  • International Options: Many countries have similar compassionate-use programs with their own rules.

Understanding these differences helps families have more informed conversations with their doctors and explore every realistic option.

If you’re exploring whether compassionate use, Right-to-Try, or other pathways might apply to your situation, our independent research team offers a free case assessment. We review your records and outline clear, practical options in plain language — no obligation.

Back to blog